Skip to main content
· 8/8/2006

David L. Hartjes v. Jeffrey P. Endicott

Citations

  • 456 F.3d 786
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20248
  • 2006 WL 2256980

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an ineffective assistance claim based on counsel’s failure to object to a breached plea agreement collapses if there was no breach
  • To establish deficient performance, defendant must show errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment
  • “A state’s promise need not be explicit to be enforceable, but more than an unfounded and unilateral belief is required to support the defendant’s assertion that the government made a particular promise.”
  • “A stateʹs promise need not be explicit to be enforceable, but more than an unfounded and unilateral belief is required to support the defendantʹs assertion that the government made a particular promise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Easterbrook, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.