Skip to main content
· 12/30/1998

David L. Grant v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation

Citations

  • 163 F.3d 1136
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 13103
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9386
  • 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2139
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 32576
  • 1998 WL 904288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting federal equitable tolling of a state limitations period for federal claims in exceptional circumstances but finding none present
  • “The limitations period begins to run when a Plaintiff receives a letter from the Union notifying her that it will pursue her claim no further.”
  • the Court declines equitable tolling due to appellant’s schizoaffective disorder and generalized anxiety disorder because equitable tolling is reserved for “exceptional circumstances, such as institutionalization or adjudged mental incompetence”
  • “We recognize that some courts have 6 allowed equitable tolling of the limitations period for other federal claims, but only in 7 exceptional circumstances, such as institutionalization or adjudged mental incompetence 8 of the litigant.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Boochever, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.