· 12/30/1998
David L. Grant v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation
Citations
- 163 F.3d 1136
- 98 Daily Journal DAR 13103
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9386
- 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2139
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 32576
- 1998 WL 904288
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting federal equitable tolling of a state limitations period for federal claims in exceptional circumstances but finding none present
- “The limitations period begins to run when a Plaintiff receives a letter from the Union notifying her that it will pursue her claim no further.”
- the Court declines equitable tolling due to appellant’s schizoaffective disorder and generalized anxiety disorder because equitable tolling is reserved for “exceptional circumstances, such as institutionalization or adjudged mental incompetence”
- “We recognize that some courts have 6 allowed equitable tolling of the limitations period for other federal claims, but only in 7 exceptional circumstances, such as institutionalization or adjudged mental incompetence 8 of the litigant.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, Boochever, Tashima
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.