David L. Fallis v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no antitrust standing despite assuming claimant was used as a fulcrum in relevant market
• holding no antitrust standing despite assuming claimant was used as a fulcrum in relevant market
• holding plaintiff lacked standing under section 4 and had no cause of action under Ohio law because Ohio law did not recognize an action for wrongful discharge and treated employment contracts “until retirement” as at-will employment contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).