· 12/18/2018
David Kyle Mueller v. State
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Mr. Sanders was fatally shot “in furtherance of [Ms.] Knight’s accomplices robbing the Sanderses of their safe” (emphasis added)
- concluding Knight’s convictions for felony murder and robbery of the ring do not violate double jeopardy
- “concluding that Mr. Sanders was fatally shot ‘in furtherance of Knight’s accomplices robbing the Sanderses of their safe’”
- discussing the merger doctrine as a sub-part of the double jeopardy analysis
- Court of Appeals decision on double jeopardy claims was not an intervening change of law
- “[Ms.] Knight had already completed the first robbery before the second robbery began that led to her felony murder charge.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.