Skip to main content
· 12/18/2018

David Kyle Mueller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Mr. Sanders was fatally shot “in furtherance of [Ms.] Knight’s accomplices robbing the Sanderses of their safe” (emphasis added)
  • concluding Knight’s convictions for felony murder and robbery of the ring do not violate double jeopardy
  • “concluding that Mr. Sanders was fatally shot ‘in furtherance of Knight’s accomplices robbing the Sanderses of their safe’”
  • discussing the merger doctrine as a sub-part of the double jeopardy analysis
  • Court of Appeals decision on double jeopardy claims was not an intervening change of law
  • “[Ms.] Knight had already completed the first robbery before the second robbery began that led to her felony murder charge.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.