Skip to main content
· 1/6/1986

David Krulik v. Board of Education of the City of New York

Citations

  • 781 F.2d 15
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21703
  • 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,827
  • 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n individual official’s acts can rise to the level of ‘policy’ when ‘senior personnel’ knowingly ‘acquiesce’ in their subordinates’ behavior.”
  • “[L]ate amendments to assert new theories are not reviewed favorably 23 when the facts and the theory have been known to the party seeking amendment since the 24 inception of the cause of action.”
  • “[L]ate amendments to assert new theories are not reviewed favorably 18 when the facts and the theory have been known to the party seeking amendment since the 19 inception of the cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumbard, Van Graafei-Land Meskill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.