Skip to main content
· 4/22/1996

David Knickerbocker v. City of Stockton, a California Municipal Corporation, George Lerner, Ralph Womack and Kenneth Wilbon

Citations

  • 81 F.3d 907
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2771
  • 3 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 453
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 4577
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8712
  • 1996 WL 189791

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that retaliation be a “substantial factor” in adverse action
  • holding same in the FLSA retaliation context
  • requiring retaliation to be a “substantial factor” in adverse employment action
  • applying “but for” standard for 27 causation during trial and on appeal
  • “It is the defendant’s affirmative burden to prove that it would have taken the adverse action if the proper reason alone had existed.”
  • adverse action closely 12 following protected activity can support inference of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Kleinfeld, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.