Skip to main content
· 8/4/2023

David King v. Timothy Riley

Citations

  • 76 F.4th 259

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a tax was motivated by penal instead of revenue-raising intent in part because the taxpayer had to pay an additional sum based on his illegal conduct
  • concluding that a tax was motivated by penal instead of revenue-raising intent in part because the taxpayer had to pay an additional sum based on his illegal conduct
  • holding that even though labeled a “tax” on conducting retail liquor business, challenged statute was nevertheless a “penalty” designed to punish the violation of state liquor laws
  • holding that even though labeled a \tax\ on conducting retail liquor business, challenged statute was nevertheless a \penalty\ designed to punish the violation of state liquor laws
  • holding that an excise tax that sought to punish retailers who violated State law was a penalty under the Tenth Amendment
  • holding that an excise tax that sought to punish retailers who violated State law was a penalty under the Tenth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.