DAVID JAMAL WILSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that more than twenty-four hours was insufficient where police repeatedly pressured suspect to cooperate
• holding that under “Mosley, a court need determine specifically whether there has been a voluntary waiver only after the government has carried its burden of showing that it complied with [all of] the required procedures”
• holding lapse in time of twenty-four hours did not preclude relief where other facts established that defendant's confession was still product of earlier unconstitutional interrogation
• holding lapse in time of twenty- four hours did not preclude relief where other facts established that defendant's confession was still product of earlier unconstitutional interrogation
• “While the suspect’s state of mind is central to the voluntariness finding, the Mosley test focuses on what the police did, and when, after the suspect exercised his or her right to remain silent.”
• “[Ojfficers repeatedly spoke to Barone for the purpose of changing his mind, failed to provide new Miranda warnings, applied pressure by emphasizing the danger he would face in Boston if he did not cooperate, and took advantage of a long delay in arraignment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).