David Harbin v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting examples of FELA actions submitted to jury based only upon \evidence scarcely more substantial than pigeon bone broth\
• court “must submit an [FELA] case to the jury when there is even slight evidence of negligence”
• “It follows that a trial judge must submit an FELA case to the jury when there is even slight evidence of negligence.”
• “It is well established that the quantum of evidence required to establish liability in an FELA case is much less than in an ordinary negligence action.”
• “It is well established that the quantum of evidence re- quired to establish liability in an FELA case is much less than in an ordinary negligence action.”
• “It is well established that the quantum of evidence re- quired to establish liability in an FELA case is much less than in an ordinary negligence action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).