David E. Tippett v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the plaintiff alleged facts that are “sufficient to make out a prima facie ease of involuntariness” and remanding the case for further proceedings
• finding that a voluntary resignation may be rendered involuntary if it is submitted under duress or coercion, or resulted fi*om government misrepresentation
• applying presumption of voluntariness to a service member’s request for discharge
• A resignation is involuntary only “if a reasonable person would have been misled by the information.”
• “[T]he plaintiff must assert a claim under a separate money-mandating constitutional provision, statute, or regulation, the violation of which supports a claim for damages against the United States.” (quoting James v. Caldera, 159 F.3d 573, 580 (Fed.Cir.1998
• “[T]he plaintiff must assert a claim under a separate money-mandating constitutional provision, statute, or regulation, the violation of which supports a claim for damages against the United States.” (quoting James v. Caldera, 159 F.3d 573, 580 (Fed. Cir.1998

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).