Skip to main content
· 7/20/1992

David E. Heasley and Kathleen Heasley, Cross-Appellees v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 967 F.2d 116
  • 70 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5398
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16206
  • 1992 WL 165835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the burden is on the prevailing party to establish number of attorney hours expended, and that such hours were reasonable
  • holding that petitioner had failed to show that government's position on valuation penalty was not substantially justified because legal issue \was in flux” and the \IRS simply argued for one of two plausible interpretations of the statute”
  • taxpayers challenged the reasonableness of the Commissioner's position with respect to four separate penalties; award of costs proportionate to number of issues on which taxpayers prevailed in that endeavor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bright, Jolly, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.