Skip to main content
· 12/7/1993

David E. And Jean E. Kuehl v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Citations

  • 8 F.3d 905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a] district court has the power to dismiss a complaint when a plaintiff fails to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Rule 8(a)(2)’s ‘short and plain statement’ requirement”
  • noting that “courts should be reluctant to impose a dismissal with prejudice for a rules violation that is neither persistent nor vexatious, particularly without some review of the merits”
  • affirming district court's dismissal with prejudice of forty-three page, 358 paragraph amended complaint for failure to comply with Rule 8 and district court's order
  • upholding district court's dismissal with prejudice after plaintiff's amended complaint failed to comply with Rule 8(a)
  • upholding the dismissal of 43-page amended complaint for non-compliance with Rule 8's \short and plain\ pleading standard
  • affirming dismissal with prejudice based on plaintiff's failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Campbell, Coffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.