David Duran v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the exhaustion requirement is “strict” but “does not operate as an absolute bar . . . .”
• holding that “the record leaves too much to speculation” to determine whether, as a matter of law, a prisén administrative remedy process was available to a plaintiff
• observing that exhaustion requirement contains “a built-in exception,” namely “that a prisoner need not exhaust remedies if they are not ‘available’” (certain internal quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing PLRA’s “strict” requirement to exhaust all available administrative remedies”
• recognizing PLRA’s “strict” requirement to exhaust all available administrative remedies”
• recognizing PLRA’s “strict” requirement to exhaust all available administrative remedies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).