Skip to main content
· 1/10/2000

David Duhaime v. Kenneth Ducharme

Citations

  • 200 F.3d 597
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 184
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 285
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 203
  • 2000 WL 12056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that persuasive authority “may help us determine what [Supreme Court] law is ‘clearly established’”
  • recognizing that persuasive authority “may help us determine what [Supreme Court] law is ‘clearly established’”
  • stating that Ninth Circuit case law may be used to help determine clearly established federal law
  • stating that Ninth Circuit case law may be used to help determine clearly established federal law
  • finding AEDPA 11 modifies preconditions for habeas relief but does not remove the courts’ jurisdiction over habeas 12 petitions
  • stating Cir- cuit law “may be persuasive authority for purposes of deter- mining whether a particular state court decision is an ‘unreasonable application’ of Supreme Court law, and also may help [courts of appeals] determine what law is “clearly established”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Schroeder, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.