David Dill, Jr. v. Arnold Holt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 2241 petitions are subject to § 2254’s exhaustion requirement
• stating that § 2241 petitioner 3 must exhaust all remedies “available in the courts of the State” (citation omitted)
• “A complete round of the state appellate process includes discretionary appellate review ‘when that review is part of the ordinary appellate review procedure in the State.’”
• “A complete round of the state appellate process includes discretionary appellate review ‘when that review is part of the ordinary appellate review procedure in the State.’”
• “A complete round of the state appellate process includes discretionary appellate review ‘when that review is part of the ordinary appellate review procedure in the State.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).