David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State Penitentiary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in order to establish standing, a litigant must show that he has a personal stake in the outcome of the case and that he has suffered some actual or threatened injury
• concluding claim was moot because there was “neither a ‘reasonable expectation’ nor ‘demonstrated probability’ that [appellant] will again return to the State Penitentiary” that he was transferred from
• concluding state prisoner lacked third- 17 party standing to assert the rights of other inmates
• determining that a prisoner’s claim is moot when he cannot show a “reasonable expectation” or “demonstrated probability” of returning to the state penitentiary where the alleged constitutional violations occurred
• concluding state prisoner lacked third-party standing to assert the rights of other inmates
• concluding state prisoner lacked third-party standing to assert the rights of other inmates

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).