Skip to main content
· 8/1/1989

David Cox v. United States

Citations

  • 881 F.2d 893
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10978
  • 1989 WL 84336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]his and other courts have applied the same rationale in holding that the United States may invoke the protection of a [private] recreational use statute”
  • stating that “[t]his and other courts have applied the same rationale in holding that the United States may invoke the protection of a [private] recreational use statute”
  • collecting cases holding that the United States may invoke the protection of state recreational use statutes
  • “Under the FTCA, if a private person would be shielded from liability … the United States must also be shielded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKay, Anderson, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.