David Cox v. Jamie Chacon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• controlling standard is whether reasonable person who is aware of all circumstances would question impartiality
• trial court’s statement to a party that “I’m beginning to question very much your sincerity,” not found to be prejudicial
• defendant’s decreased earning capacity; plaintiffs unmet needs under original decree; defendant’s wilful withholding of alimony and support payments over substantial period of time; evidence of previously undisclosed assets
• “startling dramatic” 200 percent increase in salary over five years
• comments showed impatience with defendant and his counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).