David Caldwell, Etc. And James C. Harvey v. Palmetto State Savings Bank of South Carolina, Etc., Defendants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a single letter mailed from South Carolina defendants to Texas plaintiffs was insufficient to show that defendants “conduct{ed] business in Texas,” especially where plaintiffs initiaily solicited the transactions underlying their RICO claims
• noting that the letter sent to the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs’ response was insufficient to “meet the statutory requirement”
• concluding the district court 2 has broad discretion in determining whether to dismiss or transfer a case in the interest of justice
• concluding the district court has broad discretion in determining whether to dismiss or transfer a case in the interest of justice
• concluding the district court has broad discretion in determining whether to dismiss or transfer a case in the interest of justice
• holding client and counsel jointly liable for prosecuting a merit-less appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).