David C. v. New York State Department of Social Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Bi-State was not subject to the MHRA because of differing standard for evaluating discrimination as compared to Illinois law
• noting interstate compacts are “not subject to any burden unilaterally imposed on it by either State’s law”
• affirming the trial court’s judgment granting the defendant Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim based on the interstate compact defense even though apparently no writ of mandamus had been previously filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).