David C. Ex Rel. Brown v. Leavitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an 80% noncompli- ance rate qualified as “substantial noncompliance” and mer- ited modification of the decree
• noting that defendant was “20 percent in compliance and 80 percent in noncompliance”
• noting that defendant was \20 percent in compliance and 80 percent in noncompliance\
• noting that defendant was “20 percent in compliance and 80 percent in noncompli- ance”
• rejecting argument that \courts have no equitable power to modify material provisions\ of a consent decree
• rejecting argument that “courts have no equitable power to modify material provisions” of a consent decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).