· 8/24/1995
David C. BARKER and Christina L. Barker, Husband/Wife, v. DEERE AND COMPANY, Appellant
Citations
- 60 F.3d 158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the burden of demonstrating substantial similarity falls upon the proponent of the evidence
- evidence of other injuries not admissible unless circumstances of other occurrences are “substantially similar”
- when performing Azzarello analysis, a court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff
- jury may infer from presence of other substantially similar accidents that design defect existed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cowen, Lewis, Sarokin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.