Skip to main content
· 8/24/1995

David C. BARKER and Christina L. Barker, Husband/Wife, v. DEERE AND COMPANY, Appellant

Citations

  • 60 F.3d 158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the burden of demonstrating substantial similarity falls upon the proponent of the evidence
  • evidence of other injuries not admissible unless circumstances of other occurrences are “substantially similar”
  • when performing Azzarello analysis, a court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff
  • jury may infer from presence of other substantially similar accidents that design defect existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cowen, Lewis, Sarokin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.