Skip to main content
· 6/30/1992

David Bateman v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Everett N. Dobson & Sons, Inc., Party-In-Interest

Citations

  • 970 F.2d 924
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15077
  • 1992 WL 146797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that bank's consent to mechanics' lien was not an \agreement\ for purposes of section 1823(e)
  • under D'Oench Duhme, alleged \agreement\ must be in writing, executed by bank, approved by bank's board of directors, and kept continuously in bank records from date of execution
  • under D'Oench Duhme, alleged \agreement\ ___ must be in writing, executed by bank, approved by bank's board of directors, and kept continuously in bank records from date of execution
  • Maine mechan- ____ ic's lien not an \agreement\ within meaning of D'Oench doctrine
  • Maine mechanic's lien not an \agreement\ within meaning of D'Oench doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Bownes, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.