DAVID B. ROSS v. ASSOCIATES IN NEUROLOGY, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• request to jury to “do your job” and, implicitly, to find defendant guilty, was not permissible argument
• prosecutor’s statement to jury to ‘“do your job” and, implicitly, to find defendant guilty was not permissible argument
• ‘It is far too easy to examine a transcript and point to ways to “do it better” ’
• improper argument to tell jurors to \do your job\ where it implicitly meant jury had duty to convict
• improper argument to tell jurors to “do your job” where it implicitly meant jury had duty to convict
• request to jury to “do your job,” even though not explicitly stating “job” required reaching guilty verdict, was “not permissible advocacy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).