David Adams v. Nathan A. Rice Gary T. Dixon Hazel W. Keith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no constitutional right to participate in grievance procedures
• noting that “the causation analysis includes an individual’s motivation in its calculus
• affirming district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs suit as frivolous where allegation was conclusory and nonsensical on its face
• opining the Constitution creates no entitlement to grievance procedures or access to any such procedure voluntarily established by a state
• rejecting a claim that the Constitution requires a “particular grievance procedure”
• inmates have no constitutional entitlement or due process interest in access to a grievance procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).