David A. Yentsch, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Texaco, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unlikely that there were anticom-petitive effects in the tied market where testimony suggested that, absent compulsion, plaintiff would not have purchased tied products at all
• “we are not convinced that [$15,-000.00] is sufficient to meet the test of quantitative substantiality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).