David A. Magerer v. John Sexton & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]laims under section 75B will require interpretation of the agreement and, therefore, will be preempted by Section 301.”
• proper discharge from employment is determined from the terms of the collective bargaining agreement
• “Section 301 completely preempts a state law claim, ‘if the resolution of [the] state- law depends upon the meaning of a collective bargaining agreement.’” (alteration in original) (quoting Lingle, 486 U.S. at 405-06)
• claim for intentional interference with contract held preempted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).