Skip to main content
· 2/6/1992

David A. Lampe v. Xouth, Inc., Phillippe G. Woog

Citations

  • 952 F.2d 697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that effective service of process is a prerequisite to proceeding further in a case
  • noting that “effective service of process is... a prerequisite to proceeding further in a case”
  • explaining that personal jurisdiction is acquired “over a defendant when the plaintiff serves the defendant with the complaint in a manner specified by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”
  • finding that, in order for the plaintiff to establish proper service of summons and complaint under Pennsylvania law, the plaintiff had to prove that either defendant or his authorized agent signed the receipts
  • finding that, in order for the plaintiff to establish proper service of summons and complaint under Pennsylvania law, the plaintiff had to prove that either defendant or his authorized agent signed the receipts
  • explaining that effective service of process is a prerequisite to establishing personal jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansmann, Nygaard, Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.