· 5/2/2003
David A. Field and Ellen J. Field v. United States
Citations
- 328 F.3d 58
- 91 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2123
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8474
- 2003 WL 2010729
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “interest is an ‘affected item’ ... rather than a ‘partnership item’ and therefore could not be reviewed at a partnership level proceeding.”
- “interest is an ‘affected item’ . . . rather than a ‘partnership item’ and therefore could not be reviewed at a partnership level proceeding.”
- additional interest under former Section 6621(c) is not a partnership item but rather is an affected item that turns on factual determinations made at the individual partner level and thus is not a mere computational adjustment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pee, Jacobs, Straub, Carman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.