Skip to main content
· 5/2/2003

David A. Field and Ellen J. Field v. United States

Citations

  • 328 F.3d 58
  • 91 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2123
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8474
  • 2003 WL 2010729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “interest is an ‘affected item’ ... rather than a ‘partnership item’ and therefore could not be reviewed at a partnership level proceeding.”
  • “interest is an ‘affected item’ . . . rather than a ‘partnership item’ and therefore could not be reviewed at a partnership level proceeding.”
  • additional interest under former Section 6621(c) is not a partnership item but rather is an affected item that turns on factual determinations made at the individual partner level and thus is not a mere computational adjustment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pee, Jacobs, Straub, Carman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.