· 10/29/1997
David A. Duffy v. Charles R. Wolle Harold D. Vietor Ronald Longstaff, Sued as Ronald E. Longstaff
Citations
- 123 F.3d 1026
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the § 1983 body of law applies to Bivens actions
- recognizing that the § 1983 body of law applies to Bivens actions
- recognizing that the § 1983 body of law applies to Bivens actions
- stating that for an all-male group of judges to discriminate against male hires would need more substantial evidence to support such an extraordinary finding
- stating that for an all-male group of judges to discriminate against male hires would need more substantial evidence to support such an extraordinary finding
- “Identifying those strengths that constitute the best qualified applicant is ... a role best left to employers....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Magill, Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.