Skip to main content
· 10/29/1997

David A. Duffy v. Charles R. Wolle Harold D. Vietor Ronald Longstaff, Sued as Ronald E. Longstaff

Citations

  • 123 F.3d 1026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the § 1983 body of law applies to Bivens actions
  • recognizing that the § 1983 body of law applies to Bivens actions
  • recognizing that the § 1983 body of law applies to Bivens actions
  • stating that for an all-male group of judges to discriminate against male hires would need more substantial evidence to support such an extraordinary finding
  • stating that for an all-male group of judges to discriminate against male hires would need more substantial evidence to support such an extraordinary finding
  • “Identifying those strengths that constitute the best qualified applicant is ... a role best left to employers....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Magill, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.