Skip to main content
· 6/7/1993

Davenport v. City of Rock Hill

Citations

  • 432 S.E.2d 451
  • 315 S.C. 114
  • 1993 S.C. LEXIS 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding it incorrect to suppose that single word was inserted in statute without the intention of conveying some meaning
  • “It is never to be supposed that a single word was inserted in the law of this state without the intention of thereby conveying some meaning.” (citation omitted)
  • “It is never to be supposed that a single word was inserted in the law of this state without the intention of thereby conveying some meaning.” (citation omitted)
  • “It is never to be supposed that a single word was inserted in the law of this [Sjtate without the intention of thereby conveying some meaning.”
  • \It is never to be supposed that a single word was inserted in the law of this state without the intention of thereby conveying some meaning.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finney, Harwell, Chandler, Toal, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.