· 6/7/1993
Davenport v. City of Rock Hill
Citations
- 432 S.E.2d 451
- 315 S.C. 114
- 1993 S.C. LEXIS 119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding it incorrect to suppose that single word was inserted in statute without the intention of conveying some meaning
- “It is never to be supposed that a single word was inserted in the law of this state without the intention of thereby conveying some meaning.” (citation omitted)
- “It is never to be supposed that a single word was inserted in the law of this state without the intention of thereby conveying some meaning.” (citation omitted)
- “It is never to be supposed that a single word was inserted in the law of this [Sjtate without the intention of thereby conveying some meaning.”
- \It is never to be supposed that a single word was inserted in the law of this state without the intention of thereby conveying some meaning.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finney, Harwell, Chandler, Toal, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.