Skip to main content
· 3/1/2013

Dave v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department

Citations

  • 926 F. Supp. 2d 247
  • 2013 WL 775391
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even the plaintiff was unaware of the' reasons until after litigation began
  • “[NJearly all of the courts in this Circuit to have considered the issue, have held that, in order for plaintiff to posses [sic] a liberty interest, the government must have publicly disclosed the defamatory information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.