Daust v. Daust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the general rule [is] that an action for contempt cannot be the vehicle used by a respondent to modify custody”
• “The defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue clearly may be waived, even in child custody cases.”
• “the general rule [is] that an action for contempt cannot be the vehicle used by a respondent to modify custody”
• action for contempt of order that set forth permanent custody award
• trial court did not err in denying mother’s motion to dismiss change-in-custody request raised in counterclaim to her contempt motion where she had fully participated in the process leading up to the trial court’s custody orders and had consented to the first two such orders
• trial court did not err in denying mother’s motion to dismiss change-in- custody request raised in counterclaim to her contempt motion where she had fully participated in the process leading up to the trial court’s custody orders and had consented to the first two such orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).