Dausman v. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that leave to amend should be freely given when the amendment is based on the same conduct, transaction and occurrence upon which the original claim was brought
• holding trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to amend complaint where motion was made after trial court orally granted summary judgment but before rendition of the final summary judgment
• noting that leave to amend “should be freely given, the more so ... when the amendment is based on the same conduct, transaction and occurrence upon which the original claim was brought”
• “Leave to amend should be freely given, the more so ... when the amendment is based on the same conduct, transaction[,] and occurrence upon which the original claim was brought.” (first alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).