Dausch v. Crane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that agency rules are construed as a whole and their words are given their plain and ordinary meanings
• stating that argument not adequately briefed is considered waived
• “The starting point in any statutory interpretation case is the language of the statute.” (quotation omitted)
• ambiguity in regulation need not be resolved where neither possible construction supports challenging party’s position
• “It is not the function of this court to add provisions to the statute that the legislature did not see fit to include.” (citation omitted)
• “where issues of fact are presented for resolution by an administrative agency due process requires a meaningful opportunity to be heard” (quotation and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).