Daum v. Adweiss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a person’s right is not abridged by “a law that makes it easier for others” to exercise that right
• discussing scope of the right to vote, denial, and abridgement at the time of Twenty-Sixth Amendment’s ratification
• allowing a suit challenging Texas’s absentee-voting law to proceed “[r]egardless of whether the plaintiffs are presenting on this appeal a facial or as-applied challenge” (quotation omitted)
• noting the Twenty-Sixth Amendment “has yet to be interpreted in any significant depth”
• “This circuit has not spoken with conviction about all relevant details of the ‘connection’ requirement.”
• merits decision holding that extension of privilege to older voters was not abridge- ment of younger voters’ rights under twenty-sixth amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).