Skip to main content
· 9/2/1988

Daughtry v. Diamond M Co.

Citations

  • 693 F. Supp. 856
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10249
  • 1988 WL 92626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting settlement instead of discussing federal maritime law, because parties had failed to address issue
  • rejecting settlement instead of discussing federal maritime law, because parties had failed to address issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stotler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.