· 9/2/1988
Daughtry v. Diamond M Co.
Citations
- 693 F. Supp. 856
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10249
- 1988 WL 92626
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting settlement instead of discussing federal maritime law, because parties had failed to address issue
- rejecting settlement instead of discussing federal maritime law, because parties had failed to address issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stotler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.