Daughhetee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an anti-stacking provision is unambiguous where “[a]n ordinary reader would 21 understand [the] prohibition”
• applying Missouri law and enforcing antecedent language restricting excess coverage because the policy unambiguously precluded stacking of UIM coverage limits
• “Because Missouri does not require [underinsured motor vehicle] coverage, ‘the existence of the coverage and its ability to be stacked are determined by the contract entered between the insured and the insurer.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).