Daugherty v. Sajar Plastics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court erred by evaluating the plaintiff’s FMLA retaliation claim under McDonnell Douglas where there “exist[ed] direct evidence of the discrimination.”
• applying the burden-shifting framework to ADA discrimination and FMLA retaliation claims
• “In light of the fact that Ohio’s disability discrimination law parallels the ADA in all relevant respects, we apply the same analytical framework[.]”
• “In light of the fact that Ohio’s disability discrimination law parallels the ADA in all relevant respects, we apply the same analytical framework[.]”
• “In light of the fact that Ohio’s disability discrimination law parallels the ADA in all relevant respects, we apply the same analytical framework[.]”
• plaintiff established direct evidence of FMLA retaliation when his supervisor told him that if he took FMLA leave, there would not be a job waiting for him when he returned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).