Daugherty v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding trial court’s denial of motion for continuance in part because appellant failed to show absent witness’s testimony could not have been taken by deposition
• not mentioning the form of the business entity K & K Vintage Motorcars, but stating that the business’s appeal was severed and stayed
• “This is a Deceptive Trade Practices (DTPA) case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).