Daugherty v. Diment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the assignor was free to make an assignment without “the consent of anyone” where the subject contract included a clause specifying free assignability
• provisions of land contract, note, deed of trust and assignment executed contemporaneously construed harmoniously
• provisions of land contract, note, deed of trust and assignment executed contemporaneously construed harmoniously
• “In construing the documents as a whole, the court will not treat any word or clause as meaningless if any reasonable interpretation consistent with the other portions of the contract can be ascribed to it.”
• “In construing the documents as a whole, the court will not treat any word or clause as meaningless if any reasonable interpretation consistent with the other portions of the contract can be ascribed to it.”
• “Where a business transaction is based upon more than one document executed by the parties, the documents will be construed together to determine the intent of the parties; each document will be employed to ascertain the meaning intended to be expressed by the others.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).