Indiana Court of Appeals· 11/4/2004
Daugherty v. Daugherty
Citations
- 816 N.E.2d 1180
- 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 2186
- 2004 WL 2473816
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where this Court found “clear evidence” in the prenuptial agreement and in the testimonial evidence of the parties’ intentions to keep their property separate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoffman, Robb, Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Deckard v. DeckardIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-01-24· cited 34×
- Marriage of J.M. v. N.M.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-03-31· cited 34×
- Keown v. KeownIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-04-04· cited 14×
- Nornes v. NornesIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-04-17· cited 8×
- Warren v. IOOF CEMETERYIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-02-25· cited 2×
- Jm v. NmIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-03-31
- James Fletcher, Jr. v. Hillery Fletcher (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-02-11
- Ronald E. Summers, III v. Richard Evans as Personal Representative of Mary E. Summers and Richard Evans (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-10-30
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- St. John Town Board v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-28· cited 33×
- Pardieck v. PardieckIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-02-07· cited 22×
- Boetsma v. BoetsmaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-05-30· cited 16×
- Town and Country Ford, Inc. v. BuschIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-04-23· cited 12×
- Ryan v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-12-27· cited 11×
- Antonacopulos v. AntonacopulosIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-08-17· cited 9×
- In Re Marriage of ConnerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-07-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.