Skip to main content
· 7/21/1896

Dauer v. Hildebrandt

Citations

  • 110 Mich. 272
  • 68 N.W. 145
  • 1896 Mich. LEXIS 698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that parol evidence can be used to show “the real consideration to be different from that expressed, and that it had failed” or to. show “want of consideration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hooker, Other

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.