Skip to main content
· 10/31/1985

Data Management Systems, Inc. v. EDP CORP.

Citations

  • 709 P.2d 377
  • 1985 Utah LEXIS 933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that allowance of motion under Rule 60(b) pursuant to Section 2 of UEFJ should not be “interpreted in a manner which defeats the Full Faith and Credit Clause”
  • K.S.A. 60-3007 specifically directs that the KUEFJA be interpreted and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make it uniform with the other states which enact it
  • applying an act virtually the same as New Mexico’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.