· 11/19/2018
Dastmalchian v. Dep't of Justice
Citations
- 139 S. Ct. 573
- 202 L. Ed. 2d 405
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the absurdity doctrine “does not justify judicial revision of a statute simply to make the statute more reasonable in the judges’ view”
- DCS policy on sentence calculation method was not rule or regulation under APA provision allowing declaratory claims as to validity of rule or regulation
- “A case is not authority for any point not necessary to be passed on to decide the case or not specifically raised as an issue addressed by the court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.