Skip to main content
· 6/30/1882

Dashiell v. Slingerland

Citations

  • 60 Cal. 653
  • 1882 Cal. LEXIS 531

Syllabus

<p>Jurisdiction of Supreme Court—Constitutional Law—Trespass.—In an | action for trespass on land in which the title of the plaintiff to the locus in quo was admitted, the amount alleged as damages and demanded in the prayer of the complaint was nine hundred dollars, and the verdict and judgment were for two hundred dollars.</p> <p>Held: This Court has appellate jurisdiction of the case. [Morrison, C. J., dissenting.]</p> <p>Id.—Id.—Jurisdiction of Superior Court.—The settled rule is that the amount sued for exclusive of interest is the test of jurisdiction in this Court (as also in the Superior Court) in all eases where actions are brought to recover money. [Morrison, C. J., dissenting.]</p> <p>Id.—Id.—Id.—Cases Distinguished : Gordon v. Boss, 2 Cal. 156; Doyle v. Seawall, 12 id. 280; Votan v. Reese, 20 id. 90; Dunphy v. Guindan, 13 id. 28; ZdbrisTáe v. Torrey, 20 id. 173; Meeker v. Harris, 23 id. 286; Mel-son v. Melson, 2 Munf. 542; Tipton v. Ohajñbers, 1 Mete. 565; Walker v. U. S., 4 Wall. 163; distingished.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant’s intoxication did not render him unable to make a voluntary statement since he did not appear to have been intoxicated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morrison, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.