M.D. North Carolina· 3/6/2003
Dash v. FIRSTPLUS HOME LOAN TRUST 1996-2
Citations
- 248 F. Supp. 2d 489
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3706
- 2003 WL 1038355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court could consider both a removal petition and party affidavit
- denying motion to remand based on complaint’s pleading of state court jurisdictional limit and considering other evidence of jurisdictional amount
- “Plaintiffs’ characterization of their suit as a putative class action in no way cures this [standing] defect.”
- “Plaintiffs cannot use joinder rules to cure their lack of standing.”
- parties “cannot use joinder rules to cure their lack of standing”
- allowing consideration of accountant’s affidavit valuing claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beaty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Eaton Vance Corp. Securities LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2004-04-01· cited 21×
- Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.N.D. California· 2016-07-21· cited 14×
- Short v. Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, NAS.D. West Virginia· 2005-11-18· cited 13×
- Zaycer v. Sturm Foods, Inc.D. Maryland· 2012-09-12· cited 13×
- Popoola v. Md-Individual Practice Ass'nD. Maryland· 2005-08-16· cited 9×
- Griessel v. MobleyM.D. North Carolina· 2008-05-07· cited 7×
- Covington v. Syngenta Corp.D. South Carolina· 2016-03-15· cited 6×
- Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2008-05-05· cited 5×
- Talantis v. Paugh Surgical, Inc.M.D. North Carolina· 2003-07-21· cited 3×
- in the Interest of L.R.BColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-05-30· cited 3×
- Crosby v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.D. South Carolina· 2005-12-20· cited 2×
- Salvador, Sr. v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 2020-11-30
- Dicesare v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth.North Carolina Business Court· 2017-04-11
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 4,157×
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court· 1936-05-18· cited 4,144×
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court· 1938-02-28· cited 3,971×
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 3,605×
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court· 1941-04-28· cited 2,267×
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court· 1982-06-25· cited 2,224×
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court· 1951-04-09· cited 1,278×
- Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1991-09-19· cited 1,078×
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 955×
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1973-12-17· cited 866×
- De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.Fifth Circuit· 1995-03-07· cited 616×
- Adams v. BainFourth Circuit· 1982-12-30· cited 428×
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.Fourth Circuit· 2000-02-23· cited 323×
- Gibson v. Chrysler Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2001-08-20· cited 292×
- Mulcahey v. Columbia Organic Chemicals Company, IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 1994-07-11· cited 227×
- Delvin C. Payton v. County of KaneSeventh Circuit· 2002-09-03· cited 195×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.