Daryl Dembiec & a. v. Town of Holderness

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “exhaustion of remedies is not required” when pursuing such remedies “would have been futile”
• stating that “[j]udicial treatment may be particularly suitable when the constitutionality or validity of an ordinance is in question”
• recognizing futility exception in zoning cases
• zoning boards lack general equitable jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).