Skip to main content
· 12/2/1994

Daryl Crane Pamela Crane v. Conoco, Inc., a Corporation, and Nunnallee-Cantwell, Inc., a Foreign Corporation

Citations

  • 41 F.3d 547
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 17023
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9166
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33720
  • 1994 WL 670457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that violations of OSHA do not create a private cause of action
  • “Assuming, without deciding, that oil refinery operations are, as the Cranes contend, ‘abnormally dangerous’ . . . , we note that liability is limited . . . to the kind of harm, the possibility of which makes the activity abnormally dangerous.”
  • “OSHA violations do 17 not themselves constitute a private cause of action for breach”
  • “OSHA violations do not themselves constitute a private cause of action”
  • noting no private right of action under OSHA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Trott, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.