Skip to main content
· 9/30/1991

Darwin L. Schmidt v. Ian Lee Finberg, Richard B. Bartlett, Painewebber, F/k/a Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

Citations

  • 942 F.2d 1571
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1112
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22520
  • 1991 WL 177758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a § 10(a)(3) claim comes down to whether there was any reasonable basis for the arbitrator’s denial of the requested continuance
  • the court considers whether there was any reasonable basis upon which the arbitration panel may have acted
  • the court considers whether there was any reasonable basis upon which the arbitration panel may have acted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Tuttle, Fullam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.